Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jaimee Fourlis vs Talia Gibson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fourlis vs Gibson analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaimee Fourlis vs Talia Gibson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fourlis 1 - 0 Gibson
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fourlis has won 40.92% of points on their second serve, while Gibson has won 45.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fourlis, in recent form, has won 52.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gibson has won 55.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.16% and 37.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fourlis has saved 48.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gibson has saved 59.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fourlis has won 45.71% of matches played (W/L 16/ 19), with Gibson winning 64.94% (W/L 50/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 86/ 76). Gibson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 96/ 50), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13), where as Gibson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 48/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fourlis winning 1 times and Gibson being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fourlis winning 2 and Gibson winning 1. The last match between Fourlis and Gibson was at the W60 Brisbane, 21-11-2023, First, Hard with Jaimee Fourlis getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 4:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fourlis and Gibson have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fourlis winning 1 times and Gibson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fourlis winning 0, and Gibson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fourlis has played against opponents with an average rank of 204.8 while Gibson has played against players with an average rank of 236.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fourlis has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gibson has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fourlis has converted 52.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gibson has converted 46.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
294
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
185
Rank
184
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
57% (204-157)
Career Total W/L
63% (108-64)
37% (7-12)
YTD W/L
56% (15-12)
$275,258
Career Prize Money
$75,300
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Talia Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 4:34:0 | 4:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (69/94) | 59% (47/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (42/69) | 60% (28/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 28% (7/25) | 45% (15/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (37/80) | 48% (45/94) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 1-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Talia Gibson
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Talia Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 37% (7/12) | 56% (15/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (17/28) | 54% (35/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (196/225) | 52% (305/287) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 50% (6/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 126 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 109 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:15 | 1:41:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.42 | 184.37 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (878/1357) | 65% (1278/1962) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (498/878) | 66% (841/1278) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (196/479) | 44% (302/684) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (82/157) | 45% (99/221) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (642/1418) | 43% (840/1939) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 59% (13/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 37% (7/19) | 54% (14/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 27% (11/3) |
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Despina Papamichail
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sonja Zhiyenbayeva
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
51%
(
49 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Sara Lanca
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Deborah Chiesa
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
Break Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
59%
(
49 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
68 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Talia Gibson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Leonie Kung
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Marie Weckerle
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Eva Alvarez Sande
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Talia Gibson
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Talia Gibson
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Talia Gibson
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Talia Gibson
66%
(
78 of
118)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
6
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
51 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
98
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Talia Gibson
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Mia Hasegawa
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Talia Gibson
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fourlis Vs Gibson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Talia Gibson
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
